Blinded target programs
-
What makes this different
What the local artifacts already show
This page uses real outputs already generated inside the PatWinnow workspace. Nothing below is a placeholder score. Every figure comes from local benchmark files, curated PDFs, or the blinded 13-program survey now living in ChemFTO.
Blinded target programs
-
Patent publications retrieved
-
Target-centered evidence cases
-
Context-confirmed evidence cases
-
Live retrieval coverage
KIPRIS Plus and EPO OPS coverage details load here from the current local benchmark payload.
Workflow
The product story should not start with a generic “AI platform” claim. It should start with a disciplined pipeline that turns raw patent noise into traceable chemistry output.
Target-driven patent retrieval, publication deduplication, family consolidation, and source-level logging across the enabled search stack.
Nanobot-assisted screening separates keep, target-pending, and exclude candidates before expensive downstream work begins.
Stage05 turns selected patents into structured chemistry rows, provenance-rich outputs, and review queues instead of raw screenshots.
Recent live pipeline snapshot
-
The public story stays aggregate and blinded. The private workflow can still expand into full extraction when a source document set or curated PDF batch is supplied.
Explore use cases
The homepage stays brand-level. These pages go deeper into the search, analysis, and structure-extraction workflows people actually look for on Google.
Patent analysis
See how PatWinnow frames first-pass patent analysis, what we return, and what clients usually send before a free trial or pilot.
Patent structure extraction
This page explains what PatWinnow extracts from chemistry-heavy patents and when deeper PDF work is worth running.
Patent target search
Review how PatWinnow handles search windows, source coverage, filtering, and what “first-pass” means before full extraction begins.
Benchmark
This page separates the blinded survey metrics from the structure-extraction benchmark and explains how the public evaluation is framed.
Case studies
Browse target-analysis, patent-PDF extraction, and target-search case-study layouts that explain inputs, outputs, and review flow.
Benchmark snapshot
Early product pages lose trust when they mix validated numbers with aspirational claims. PatWinnow should separate the blinded target-survey numbers from the anonymous single-document extraction benchmark that proves row-level chemistry field capture is already possible.
Anonymous structure-heavy benchmark
Anonymous text-forward pass
How to present this publicly
| Sample deliverable | Preview row | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Patent analysis shortlist CSV | Redacted Family A, keep, deep_review |
Shows the narrowed review-set format instead of only aggregate counts. |
| Structure extraction rows CSV | Record A, structure field redacted, assay note retained |
Shows that the public proof already has row-level chemistry output shape. |
Contact
If you want a private pilot on your own patent set, a blinded target survey around your program, or a review of whether your workflow can surface structured chemistry fields, normalized names, assay notes, and broader bioactivity data in one pass, start with a short benchmark engagement.
What to send
Tell us what target, disease area, patent set, or chemistry extraction problem you want benchmarked. We will use that to scope a first-pass review and a realistic pilot.